WHAT IS ENOUGH?

(This post is also found on the art blog)

The other night I went with a friend to hear a (relatively) well-known potter talk about her work. She was exceptionally articulate about her process and vision and the small audience was very receptive.

Pottery/ceramics is one of the oldest art forms and the kiln is the tool of alchemical transformation changing what was once malleable earth into something solid and lasting. But I am not a big fan of some of the modern ceramic designs in which, to my mind, the spiritual and the beautiful has been replaced with gravity-defying cleverness or Dali-esque images.

This potter’s art pieces are massive and earthy; they are noted for their size/volume/weight and intricacy of design. There are tubes, ‘worms’, extrusions, pots, balls, gourd shapes, etc. all piled, organically twisted and turned within each other and bound in one large ceramic hill. I am tempted to say that everything is included but the kitchen sink but there were some glimpses of that too. Stop! That’s enough!

At one point she said she found the medium of painting too limiting and how she feels forced to crash through barriers. After watching a lot of slides and hearing her presentation I felt her enthusiasm and passion for what she did – and I could see flashes of interest or beauty in some of the pieces – but they were still too ‘extravagant’ for me. I felt a super abundance, a feeding frenzy of ceramic creation that left me feeling stuffed and uneasy. There was too much of everything.

During the question period I asked her “if there was a problem in knowing when to stop.” How did she know when a piece was done? This is a question I face all the time. She held out an imaginary glass and said with great authority that just as she knew when the glass was full of water, she knew when a ‘sculpture’ was done.

I must admit I felt a little foolish in the face of her certainty and confidence. Later in the evening I thought to myself, she must know what she is talking about – after all, she is very well-known and successful. I poked around the edges of the question. Was my ego smarting because her answer implied that any experienced artist knew when to stop – and that by extension because I had asked such a fundamental question I was obviously not a good artist?

Then two responses came to my attention. What is one person’s ‘just enough’ may be another person’s ‘not enough’ or ‘too much.’ And secondly, due to the nature of her art form, she could add and subtract elements of her art piece as she pleased until she found the stopping place, a point of balance.

In contrast, with ink wash art, every stroke of the brush is a final one. It cannot be changed, moved or removed. It is permanent. The most that can be done is that it can be layered by more ink. There is a great finality in ink work, a no turning back momentum. If I go a step too far in painting something, it is ruined or spoiled.

So my question to the potter was an irrelevant one for her. While she seemed driven to include as much as she could, I am driven to remove as much as I can. I find the setting of limits frees me to concentrate. By eliminating some choices my mind is not constantly weighing and judging alternatives and I can focus my energy on what is essential.

Every activity has its built-in questions. Should I add more salt? Should I round off this edge of marble? Should I cut this material on the bias? There is always a point of no return, a need to commit to a certain path, a particular focus. There is always a jumping off point into the unknown which contributes to the exhilaration of all creative activity.

(For Marie Taylor Ink blog followers:  I posted some new art work this week under Art Talk on the art blog at http://MarieTaylorArt.wordpress.com)

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “WHAT IS ENOUGH?

  1. Is any work of art ever perfect (completed)? I am reminded that painter Frank Auerbach only regards a painting as being finished when he is physically and mentally exhausted. His technique – applying paint and scraping it off harshly with a palette knife – is a desperate one that admits no ‘completeness’.

    Since semiotician Roland Barthes wrote his essay ‘Death of the Author’ the question of the completeness of any work of art has been totally thrown up into the air. As soon as a work of art is there to be seen, heard, or otherwise experienced by someone other than the artist then it ceases to belong to its initiator. The creative process continues through experience and interpretation; this is no less a process of art than is the initial execution, and by it the work of art ceases to be the property of its initiator; this is a process which is inextricably woven into, welded to, alloyed with the work of art, and cannot be separated from its initiation/execution. Thus as long as a work of art is available it is incomplete. A work of art is a continuing event.

    I suppose that even the act of shutting it away fails to stop this process, but that is a philosophical argument I can pursue more deeply another time.

    M

    Like

    1. You open a lot of roads to travel by your response, one of them being the limit of involvment/responsibility/authority of the artist. After a work of art is iinitiated by the artist and the seed of expression planted, so to speak, I think the art work itself acquires an individual will or momentum that may accommodate the artist’s original direction or totally depart from it.

      How many times has a poem you have written taken on an unexpected dimension or interpretation – one that you may not have noticed but was implicate in its essence. I think it is these alternative perspectives or voices that the viewers sometimes identify and that give some art such great power, for the original artist is more a channel for than the author of the creative act.

      When I go ‘too far’ in a painting it is usually because I have allowed my thinking mind or my ego to insert itself into the creative experience and try to direct/improve/add to what may already be sufficient. As for a work of art never being completed, I think it is the dialogue that the art can initiate or maintain with the audience (perhaps that is too passive a word) that gives it longevity.

      Thank you for an interesting start to the day. Marie 🙂

      Like

  2. “By eliminating some choices my mind is not constantly weighing and judging alternatives and I can focus my energy on what is essential.” This is a good idea to practice. I teach riding, and to me, horses are a lot of art. People tend to do what has always been done and thus fail to listen to the horse telling them what they should do.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s